Does everyone have different mind’s eyes, mind’s ears, and mind’s tongues?Episode 79← All Episodes

When you imagine something — like the sun peeking over a mountain during an early morning rainstorm — do you see it with rich visual detail, or instead with very little internal picture? In an earlier episode we tackled the spectrum of visual imagination, from hyperphantasia to aphantasia — and in this episode we dive even deeper with guest Joel Pearson to surface the most surprising differences between people’s internal lives. How does your experience differ from other people’s, and how does your brain cobble together the skills you have to accomplish what you need?

Episode Audio

Episode Video

More Information:

Take the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire

No Inner Voice? New Study Reveals Its Impact on Memory. Neuroscience News. May 14, 2024

Marks DF. Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British journal of Psychology. 1973 Feb;64(1):17-24.

Cui X, Jeter CB, Yang D, Montague PR, Eagleman DM. Vividness of mental imagery: Individual variability can be measured objectively. Vision research. 2007 Feb 1;47(4):474-8.

Dance CJ, Hole G, Simner J. The role of visual imagery in face recognition and the construction of facial composites. Evidence from Aphantasia. Cortex. 2023 Oct 1;167:318-34.

De Vreese LP. Two systems for colour-naming defects: verbal disconnection vs colour imagery disorder. Neuropsychologia. 1991 Jan 1;29(1):1-8.

Douglas RN. Considering the witness in interviews: Commentary on Memon & Stevenage on witness-memory. Psycoloquy. 1996;7.

Kosslyn SM. Image and mind. Harvard University Press; 1980.

Kosslyn SM. Mental images and the brain. Cognitive neuropsychology. 2005 May 1;22(3-4):333-47.

Pylyshyn ZW. The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological review. 1981 Jan;88(1):16.

Pylyshyn Z. Return of the mental image: are there really pictures in the brain?. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2003 Mar 1;7(3):113-8.

Amedi A, Malach R, Pascual-Leone A. Negative BOLD differentiates visual imagery and perception. Neuron. 2005 Dec 8;48(5):859-72.

Hatakeyama T. On the Possibility That Individual Differences in Imagery Ability Have Innate Bases. The Japanese Journal of Mental Imagery, 2021, Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 21-41.

McKelvie SJ. The Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire as a predictor of facial recognition memory performance. British Journal of Psychology. 1994 Feb;85(1):93-104.

McKelvie SJ, Demers EG. Individual differences in reported visual imagery and memory performance. British Journal of Psychology. 1979 Feb;70(1):51-7.

Bird G, Viding E. The self to other model of empathy: Providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2014 Nov 1;47:520-32.

Marks DF. Construct validity of the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1989 Oct;69(2):459-65.

Campos A, Pérez-Fabello MJ. Psychometric quality of a revised version Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire. Perceptual and motor skills. 2009 Jun;108(3):798-802.

Pearson J, Kosslyn SM. The heterogeneity of mental representation: Ending the imagery debate. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):10089-92.

Kunzendorf R. Külpe’s Imageless But Visionary Idea: That Vivid Visual Images Are “Centrally Excited Sensations” Which Are Constructed From “Imageless Thoughts”. Imagination, Cognition and Personality. 2021 Mar;40(3):273-89.

Nedergaard JS, Lupyan G. Not Everybody Has an Inner Voice: Behavioral Consequences of Anendophasia. Psychological Science. 2024 May 10:09567976241243004

Also listen to Inner Cosmos Episode 59: Do you visualize like I do? With Ed Catmull

SUBSCRIBE AND LISTEN ON: