Can we engineer human thought? with Tom Griffiths

Can the mind be captured with math? Modern AI seems to have burst out of the gate recently, but is it actually the latest chapter in a 300-year project to turn thought into something we can model? Why does current AI need petabytes of data, but a child can learn from just a few examples? Why does AI have ‘jagged’ intelligence – meaning it looks brilliant in one moment and then does something that seems nonsensical? In physics we have various laws (gravity, motion, etc), and today we’re joined by cognitive scientist Tom Griffiths to ask whether we’re moving towards laws of thought.

Episode Audio

Episode Video

More Information:

Tom Griffiths (2026). The Laws of Thought: The Quest for a Mathematical Theory of the Mind.

Inner Cosmos Episode 85: What is a thought?

Tom Griffiths webpage

SUBSCRIBE AND LISTEN ON:

"David Eagleman is the kind of guy who really does make being a neuroscientist look like fun."
- New York Times

"Eagleman has a talent for testing the untestable, for taking seemingly sophomoric notions and using them to nail down the slippery stuff of consciousness."
- The New Yorker

"[A] neuroscientist and polymath."
- Wall Street Journal

"A popularizer of impressive gusto...[Eagleman] aims, grandly, to do for the study of the mind what Copernicus did for the study of the stars."
- New York Observer